Kimmer Coppejans vs Toby Samuel Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Recent second serve performance indicates that Kimmer Coppejans has a slight advantage, winning 46.26% of points compared to Toby Samuel's 43.00%.
• With regards to returning games, Coppejans also excels, capturing 49.61% of opponents' second serve points, whereas Samuel achieves 45.45%.
• First serve return success favors Coppejans slightly, with a 29.87% success rate compared to Samuel's 28.70%.
• Under pressure, Coppejans shows resilience by saving 54.34% of breakpoints, outperforming Samuel's 49.72% save rate. Could this determine the match's outcome?
• Comparing overall performance in the past year, Toby Samuel has a higher win percentage of 76.47% over Coppejans' 61.04%.
• Both players perform best on hard surfaces, each having a career win rate of 62% on this surface.
• Regarding match experience, Coppejans has competed more frequently in the Challengers/ITF circuit, while Samuel has excelled in Futures/Satellites events with an 80.00% win rate. How might the level of competition they faced impact the match?
• Historically, Coppejans has the upper hand in direct confrontations, securing victory in their only previous encounter.
• In deciding sets, Coppejans holds an edge with a 55% win rate compared to Samuel's 46% over the last year.
• Opponent quality faced by Coppejans averages a rank of 279.27, tougher than the opponents for Samuel, averaging a rank of 378.19.
• Lastly, Coppejans is more effective at converting breakpoints recently, achieving a 36.68% conversion rate, while Samuel manages 27.57%.

Editorial Prediction (November 25, 2025, UTC):

As we assess the upcoming match between Kimmer Coppejans and Toby Samuel, several key aspects stand out in determining the likely victor. Kimmer Coppejans shows a superior performance in many crucial areas, such as second serve points won and breakpoint conversion rate.

Although Toby Samuel has had a higher overall win percentage in the last year, his competition level has generally been lower than that of Coppejans. This difference in competition quality could significantly influence the match dynamics.

Moreover, historical head-to-head results favor Coppejans, as he has won their only previous encounter, which was also played on a hard surface, their mutually favored surface type.

Considering these statistical insights and past performance, Kimmer Coppejans is the more likely candidate to secure victory in this upcoming match.